Central Queensland University

GenAI: Will It Deepen the Digital Divide in Australian Classrooms?

Edtech advocate and promote generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools as transformative, offering personalised scalable, and interactive learning experience. That only works for some schools. While some experiment with AI-driven platforms and policies, others lack basic digital infrastructure. The risk is clear: GenAI may not democratise education. Instead it might deepen existing divides unless we have targeted policies and equitable implementation.

From “AI for ALL”  to Unequal Access

GenAI has potential. It can adapt explanations to student needs, offer 24/7 academic support, and automate repetitive tasks that are very time consuming for teachers. The major assumption in the use of GenAI is that all students and teachers are equipped enough, have access to the technology, the skills to use it, and the literacy to question it.

The UNESCO report on Global education Monitoring Report, 2023: technology in education:a tool on whose terms? revealsaccess to AI-enhanced learning tools remains highly unequal across socioeconomic lines. Many students in rural and remote communities, as well as those from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, are less likely to benefit. Reasons?  Limited access to devices, patchy internetand language bias in AI systems. Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite internet once installed offers a promising solution for bridging the digital divide  in rural areas.

The OECD Education Policy Outlook 2024 reports on building equitable societies, includinghelping manage teacher workload through the support of AI. However, it also suggests that students without digital literacy may rely on AI outputs without critical understanding, leading to superficial or inaccurate learning. Australia’sdigital divide is already evident more pronounced between urban and regional schools. Some private and well funded schools are integrating AI literacy into their classroom practices, while public schools in lower SES areas are still navigating foundational digital inclusion.

What’s Happening in Australian Classrooms?

A range of state-level and system-wide GenAI pilot programs are already underway. These examples illustrate both innovation and inequality. 

In Western Australia, a $4.7 million AI pilot program funded by the federal and state governments is exploring how AI can reduce teacher workload through lesson planning and administrative support. Eight public schools are involved in this initial phase. 

In South Australia, the Department of Education partnered with Microsoft to launch EdChat, a generative chatbot trialled in eight high schools in an initial trial completed in August 2023. Designed to support inquiry-based learning, the chatbot raised questions around student data privacy, accuracy of feedback and classroom integration.  

In NSW, the government developed NSWEduChat, an AI assistant being trialled in 16 public schools. Unlike ChatGPT, it prompts students to reflect and reason, rather than delivering direct answers. The tool aims to align with pedagogical goals, but requires teachers to mediate use and guide students’ understanding. 

In Queensland, Brisbane Catholic Education developed Catholic CoPilot, grounded in Catholic teaching, tradition and theology. Teachers use it for lesson planning, report writing, and generating resources, showing that customised AI is feasible within institutional values.

In Victoria, an independent school in Melbourne, Haileybury Keysborough , embraced ChatGPT and created school-wide protocols to teach students ethical and effective AI use. These include critical thinking tasks and assessments designed to discourage AI overreliance.

 These examples show the growing momentum but also risk of a two-speed system. Well-resourced schools move quickly, underfunded ones lag behind, potentially widening the gap in both learning outcomes and digital literacy.

AI Literacy:The New Divide

One of the most overlooked challenges in this debate is the literacy gap around AI. Knowing how to access GenAI is not enough. Students and teachers need to understand how these tools work, their limitations and how to verify output generated by these AI systems. 

A 2024 Australian Education Union Survey Victoria Branch revealed 1,560 underfunded public schools in Victoria.  Public schools, particularly in regional and low-income areas, have limited opportunities. According to the Australian Education Union’s (AEU) 2024 article on future skills for educators, teachers are “left to navigate the ethical and pedagogical risks of AI on their own”, often without clear national guidance, curriculum-aligned training, or digital infrastructure to experiment safely.

This leads to a two-tier system. n one, students and teachers are supported to use AI thoughtfully as a scaffold for learning collaboration, and innovation. In the other, they are either excluded from AI use altogether, or exposed to it in ways that lack context, clarity, critical literacy, or alignment with pedagogy. This new two-tier of inequality will produce students who can interrogate technology critically, and those who treat it as an unquestioned authority.

Even more concerning, the AEU notes that “students already at a disadvantage are most at risk of falling further behind” if AI adoption is left to market forces or uneven state-by-state initiatives.

Design, Governance, and Inclusion

GenAI tools are not culturally neutral. They reflect the data they are trained on, mostly English language, Western centric internet sources. Without careful consideration, they can reinforce linguistic, cultural, and cognitive bias.

Bender, in On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots,  warns that the large language models (LLM), on which GenAI is based, often reproduce harmful stereotypes and misinformation unless explicitly mitigated. This risk is amplified in educational settings where students may lack the critical skills to identify inaccuracies.

Equity in AI use means more than access, it demands representation, transparency, and contextual sensitivity. We need AI tools aligned to local curricula, respectful of cultural knowledge systems, and available in accessible formats.

What Can Be Done?

Invest in infrastructure for underserved schools to ensure that all public schools particularly in regional, remote and low SES areas have reliable internet, updated devices, and tech support.

Moving beyond one-off briefings. Teachers need ongoing training that is curriculum-aligned, classroom tested, and critically reflective. Professional learning communities, and microcredentials in AI pedagogy could help bridge the gap.

Engage learners, families, and communities in conversations about AI use in education and developing investing in open source AI that reflects Australia’s educational and cultural diversity.

As educators, researchers, and policymakers we have a choice. We can let technology set the pace, or we can slow down, ask critical questions, and build systems that centre human dignity and learning equity. Let us ensure that GenAI supports the public good, not just private innovation.

Let us ensure no learner is left behind in the age of artificial intelligence.

Meena Jha is an accomplished researcher, educator, and leader in the field of computer science and information technology, currently serving as Head of the Technology and Pedagogy Cluster at Central Queensland University (CQU), Sydney, Australia.

Don’t glorify war – and five other excellent ways to explore commemoration days with children

Anzac Day and Remembrance Day hold a prominent place in Australian cultural and education calendars, and educators and parents are often encouraged to engage children in commemorative events. This article explores some of the challenges involved in engaging children with commemoration days. It offers six tips to support children’s understanding of these events and participate in them in meaningful and respectful ways. We also explore how to challenge cultural myths and avoid glorifying war.

1. What is a commemoration, and why do we have these events?

Supporting children to understand that commemoration is very different to celebration is essential. Children can understand that we might celebrate a birthday but commemorate someone’s life at a funeral. In the same way, we might celebrate Christmas, Diwali or Hanukkah, but we commemorate Anzac Day and Remembrance Day because they are about loss, rather than celebrating a happy event.

Many countries mark special days to commemorate those who served their countries in various capacities during past and current conflicts. Remembrance Day, which marks the end of World War I, is one example. Commemorative services are held in many of the countries that were involved in the conflict, where the day may also be known as Armistice Day or Veterans Day.

It should be noted that these events change over time. They might have started for one particular conflict but were broadened to include others. For example, Anzac Day once commemorated only World War 1, for the loss of those in the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC). Now we also recognise other international conflicts, peace keeping missions and service provided within Australia on that day. Similarly, we now include other service organisations in our Anzac Day events, such as first responders and emergency services.

2. Why, what and how we remember

Why?

These commemorative days provide an opportunity for children to develop their knowledge and understanding of the past and current sacrifices of those who have lost their lives or were injured when serving their countries. Injuries can be physical, mental and/or moral. These events also remind us of the contributions and hardships that they endured at the time, but for those still living, they still endure due to memories and injuries.

It is important to acknowledge the families and friends who lost loved ones in these conflicts, as well as their vital role in caring for those whose lives were deeply affected by their service. War and conflict change people, and those around them also carry that impact.

What?

Crucially, older children are encouraged to develop knowledge and critical thinking about the choices our society makes regarding which conflicts to remember. For example, WWI and WWII are frequently highlighted at these events, while conflicts such as Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq, plus peace-keeping missions, often receive far less recognition. Similarly, Australia’s own Frontier Wars—the conflicts between Indigenous Australians and European settlers for over 100 years during colonisation—remain largely unacknowledged in many commemorative events.

Importantly, women are often less visible and less likely to be mentioned at these events. Many women have served our country and communities in ways that were unseen. That included working in ammunition factories, working on farms to ensure Australians could still eat when male farmers went to war, raising children, fundraising, supporting the morale and welfare of deployed personnel, and keeping businesses afloat when male members of their household were away. Also, women did a lot of logistical, administrative and spy work in past conflicts which needs to be remembered.

How?

It is important for children to recognise that commemorating is a personal experience. While some people choose to attend events and marches, others may prefer to remember and reflect quietly at home, outside in nature, or at family events. There is no single right way to commemorate.

Some people who have served or supported a veteran may choose not to take part in commemorations because it is too painful or something they are trying hard to forget. This is not unpatriotic nor un-Australian – rather, it’s a deeply personal response.

 3.  What happens at these events and how to behave respectfully

Commemorative events are full of colour, symbolism and rituals. When children understand what they will see at these events and why they are there, they are more likely to understand, appreciate and connect with the experience

Scaffold discussions and explorations with children that let them know what they might see at these events. There could be veterans, people in uniforms, first responders, emergency services, cadets, medals, rosemary, flags, service horses and dogs, wreaths, crowds and cenotaphs. They might also hear pipers, bugles, bands, speeches, prayers and hymns.

Children might ask questions about some symbols and rituals, so you can follow their lead and learn about them together before and after the events.

Significantly, during certain parts of the ceremony, everyone, including children, are expected to be quiet, reflective and respectful. Provide opportunities for children to practice the skills of ‘being quiet’ before the commemoration day and discuss options of what their brains can think about during this time, such as what they saw and heard. During a ceremony, there are specific protocols that will be observed, such as laying a wreath. This can be explored through free, online books for preschoolers, primary school-aged children, digital interactives, and accompanying educational materials. ABC’s Playschool have an Anzac Day special episode for younger children. Older children might enjoy learning the Ode in Auslan.

4.  How to avoid glorifying war

Commemorative events have gained greater prominence in recent decades, with a deliberate effort to broaden what is commemorated to increase crowds. This is not necessarily wrong, as community remembrance can foster a deeper appreciation and respect for those who serve the country, their communities and their family members. That said, we have a responsibility to ensure that children do not become part of the “Anzackery” and the commercialisation of such events. We also do not want children to think that service, sacrifice and mateship are only qualities that belong to those in the military. Remind children that many people who serve our community in unseen ways may not be a part of these events nor wear a uniform.

5.  Busting common myths

There are many myths surrounding these events that you can explore with children. In this figure, the myth is in bold font and the facts are in plain font below.

6. Educators, take care of children from service families

With one in 20 households having a current or previously serving military member, it is important educators find out which children are from Defence, veteran, and first responder families. This can be done by having a question on your enrolment form for an educational service and by actively providing opportunities to learn more about whether families at your service commemorate these days publicly or privately through discussions and interactions. Crucially, do not assume all military-connected families will want to join commemorative events.

Keep in mind that this may be a time of great sadness for many families, and reminders of these days can be challenging. Tread carefully and work to support the child and family during these times. Many veterans feel the significant money and time spent on such events could be used to improve veteran health services. A more appropriate way to commemorate may be to raise money to support a veteran charity, such as Legacy.

Finally

As commemorations like Anzac Day are embedded in the Australian Curriculum at various stages of education, it’s essential that children are given opportunities to develop age-appropriate knowledge, skills, and empathy around these events. This includes understanding the historical context, cultural significance, and personal impact of war and service, as well as the broader themes of peace, resilience, and community.

Marg Rogers is a senior lecturer in early childhood, University of New England, Emily Small is an early childhood teacher and consultant, Amy Johnson is a lecturer in strategic communication, Central Queensland University.

We have a massive teaching shortage. Here’s how to fix it

The Federal Department of Education predicts an alarming teacher shortage of 4,100 teachers by 2025. It is now more pressing than ever that we explore ways of addressing this crisis. 

Our research examined female Initial Teacher Education (ITE) completion data in Australia to identify trends around which degree types (postgraduate and undergraduate) and study modes (internal, external, and multimodal) are likely to attract more potential female ITE students, and subsequently increase the ITE completion and ultimately the teacher supply pipeline.   

The research reveals a declining trend in ITE completion by females in the internal study mode for both degree types.  On the contrary, there has been an increasing trend in ITE completion by females in the external and multimodal study modes for both types of programs.  We therefore argue that policymakers and universities should make these programs and study modes more accessible to potential female ITE students.  This would help to maximise female ITE completion in tackling the predicted teacher shortage. 

Why use female ITE completion data

Historically, the teaching profession in Australia – and globally – has attracted more females than males. As such, efforts to increase the number of females graduating from ITE programs would play a significant role in bolstering the teaching workforce. Supporting women’s entry and retention in the teaching profession is key to ensuring an adequate ongoing teacher supply.  

A closer look at what the female ITE completion data tell us 

Our research shows that for the period from 2001 to 2021, there was a significant decline – by nearly 40 per cent – of female ITE completion in the internal study mode for undergraduate ITE programs. But at the same time, female ITE completion by multimodal study doubled and nearly tripled for female ITE graduates in the external study mode.   

Similar observations can be seen with the postgraduate ITE programs.  The internal study mode declined by nearly 20 per cent in the same period. For the external and multimodal study modes, there were mammoth increases of 264.40% and 1089.11% respectively in female ITE completion.  

It is clear that there is a growing interest by females to enrol in and complete ITE programs in the external and multimodal study modes as opposed to the internal study mode. 

A graph showing the percentage of a course type

Description automatically generated

The upward trend in the external and multimodal study modes is likely attributed, in part, to technological advancements.  The increased use and accessibility of the internet in homes would have contributed to the growth in female ITE completion in these modes of study.  

These same technological advancements facilitated the adoption of online delivery methods for ITE degrees by universities. The shift to online learning around 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic would have also contributed to the upward trend in the external study mode. 

Given the increasing trend in female ITE completion in these flexible study modes, universities would be wise to make these modes more accessible to maximise ITE completion.  We argue that policymakers, universities and schools have an important role to play in this space to address the teacher shortage. 

Policymakers should consider: 

Offering financial support, such as scholarships and financial incentives, which are specifically targeted at female students, for example: 

  1. loans or grants for female students during placements to help cover living expenses; and 
  2. needs-based support for female students from underrepresented or disadvantaged backgrounds. 
  3. Capping tuition fees to ensure they remain affordable for all female students. 

Universities should consider:  

Providing support for students balancing academic studies with other commitments, such as family duties, which disproportionately burden female students, such as: 

  1. flexible assignment extension and leave of absence policies; and 
  2. subsidised childcare services. 

Offering flexible study options, which might include: 

  1. part-time study;  
  2. evening classes; 
  3. block study; and 
  4. mixed study mode. 

Enhancing the accessibility of external and multimodal programs by: 

  1. providing 24/7 IT helpdesk support and certified training programs to aid the development of skills required for online learning; 
  2. implementing user-friendly learning management systems and eLearning tools; and 
  3. offering funding for suitable IT equipment and internet access, especially for those in regional areas.

Fostering supportive and inclusive learning environments by: 

  1. establishing peer support groups and academic skills advising tailored to external and online students; 
  2. providing networking opportunities;  
  3. mentorship programs; and 
  4. further initiatives that address the unique challenges faced by women in tertiary study. 

Schools should consider: 

Collaborating with policymakers and universities in structured partnerships to: 

  1. facilitate the establishment of outreach programs; 
  2. provide mentoring initiatives; and 
  3. promote teaching as a viable and rewarding career choice for females.

Investing in flexible, supportive, and financially accessible ITE programs, alongside broader strategies can encourage more females to enrol in and complete ITE degrees.  This would contribute to ensuring a steady supply of qualified teachers to help avert the pending teacher shortage. 

From left to right: Scott Cowie is a librarian in Academic Engagement Services at Griffith University, who has a keen interest in educational research.  Loan Dao is an Educational Designer at the University of New South Wales and an Adjunct Lecturer in the School of Access Education at Central Queensland University.  Jeanne Allen is an Associate Professor in the School of Education and Professional Studies at Griffith University and is also a member of the Griffith Institute for Educational Research.  Darren Pullen is a Lecturer in Health Science and Information and Communications Technology in the School of Education at the University of Tasmania.